MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403834417 · doi:10.1681/asn.2024s5r4rxwp

Modeling Cardiorenal Protection with SGLT2 Inhibition in Type 1 Diabetes: An Analysis of DEPICT-1 and -2

2024· article· en· W4403834417 on OpenAlexaff
Massimo Nardone, Luxcia Kugathasan, Vikas S. Sridhar, Pritha Dutta, David J.T. Campbell, Anita T. Layton, Bruce A. Perkins, Sean Barbour, Tony K.T. Lam, Adeera Levin, Leif Erik Lovblom, Istvan Mucsi, Rémi Rabasa‐Lhoret, Valeria E. Rac, Peter Senior, Ronald J. Sigal, Aleksandra Stanimirovic, Alessandro Doria, David Z.I. Cherney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of British ColumbiaSinai Health SystemUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of TorontoToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiorenal syndromeType 2 diabetesMedicineDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineIntensive care medicineEndocrinologyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve glycemic control and lower insulin requirements in type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). While SGLT2 inhibitors lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) risk in T2D, dedicated cardiorenal outcome trials have not been performed in T1D. Using validated risk prediction models, the current analysis evaluated the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on estimated CVD and ESKD risk in a T1D cohort. Methods: Demographics, medical history, biomarkers, and blood pressure were extracted from 1,473 participants with T1D enrolled in the DEPICT-1 and -2 trials. Data at baseline, week -24, -52, and -56 (4 weeks off-treatment) were used to estimate 10-year CVD and 5-year ESKD risk using the Steno T1 Risk Engine (SRE) and the Scottish Diabetes Research Network (SDRN) risk prediction models. Risk reduction was determined based on the percent change in risk from baseline between participants receiving dapagliflozin (pooled 5 and 10mg) vs. placebo, and evaluated statistically using a two-factor repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The relative 10-year estimated CVD risk was significantly lower following 52 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment (SRE: -5.8% [-8.4, -3.3%] & SDRN: -11.9% [-16.1, -7.8%]; ; P<0.01). The 5-year ESKD risk was also significantly lower following 52 weeks of dapagliflozin treatment (SRE: -8.4% [-12.4, -4.4%]; P<0.01). The greatest improvement in ESKD risk was observed at week 56 (-12.8% [-16.6, -9.0%]; P<0.01), in conjunction with an expected rise in eGFR post drug cessation. Conclusion: Dapagliflozin improves estimated CVD and ESKD risk in T1D participants, emphasizing the need for cardiorenal outcome trials in people living with T1D. By avoiding the acute, reversible GFR “dip” with SGLT2 inhibition, estimation of ESKD risk using models that incorporate GFR may be best performed when drug is discontinued.Figure 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→