MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403834817 · doi:10.1002/wlb3.01308

Cougar spatiotemporal response to human activities in a multi‐use forest landscape on southern Vancouver Island

2024· article· en· W4403834817 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Emerald Arthurs, Jason T. Fisher, Elicia Bell, Christopher Bone

Bibliographic record

VenueWildlife Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development Fund
KeywordsGeographyLandscape connectivityForest fragmentationEcologyBiodiversityBiological dispersalBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recreational activities have been shown to induce fear responses in carnivores, causing both spatial and temporal displacement that can have cascading effects on the wider ecological community. Cougars Puma concolor are one species that are particularly sensitive to human disturbances as they have been found to be impacted by various forms of recreational activities. This research aimed to quantify the spatial and temporal responses of cougars to human activities on southern Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada. Fifty camera traps were deployed in a systematic probabilistic sampling design and data from the summer season of 2022 was used for analyses. We modeled cougar weekly occurrence frequency in relation to human (hikers and bikers) occurrence frequency, vehicle occurrence frequency, and landscape features, using generalized linear mixed models. Temporal responses of cougars were investigated using activity pattern analysis to compare activity patterns within a recreation area and a restricted public access reserve. Cougars avoid occurring at sites where recreationalists frequently visited, but not sites frequented by vehicles on unpaved roads. We observed minimal influence of habitat features or prey availability on cougar occurrence frequency, as measured by information loss (AIC c scores). Activity pattern analysis did not demonstrate significant differences in cougar daily activity patterns between the recreation area and no‐entry reserve, suggesting a lack of temporal response. These results suggest recreational activities on southern Vancouver Island are impacting cougar spatial – but not temporal – behavioral dynamics. Insights on how cougars respond to recreational activities can help inform landscape management and policies by providing information that can be used to mitigate negative impacts and thus ensure that recreational activities are remaining compatible with conservation efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWildlife BiologySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207