MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403836429 · doi:10.1007/s12672-024-01484-1

Glucose deprivation impairs hypoxia-inducible factor-1α synthesis

2024· article· en· W4403836429 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Stuart, Michael Ohh

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)Hypoxia-inducible factorsTranslation (biology)Protein biosynthesisGlycolysisIntegrated stress responseOxygen tensionHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1Carbohydrate metabolismSuppressorBiologyCellular adaptationPost-translational regulationCell biologyChemistryMetabolismEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiochemistryDownregulation and upregulationMessenger RNAOxygenPhosphorylationGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are key transcriptional mediators of the hypoxic response and are implicated in oncogenesis. HIFα is regulated by a well-characterized, oxygen-dependent degradation pathway involving the von Hippel Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor protein. However, comparatively little is known about HIFα regulation at the translational level, particularly under cellular stress. There is evidence that HIFα expression not only responds to changes in oxygen tension, but also nutrient availability. In this study, we monitored global translation rates, ATP levels and HIF1α synthesis rates in response to glucose starvation or glycolysis inhibition. We found that both global and HIF1α-specific translation rates decline under glucose deprivation that is concomitant with ATP reduction. These results are in contrast with previous reports showing preferential HIF1α synthesis despite global translation suppression under hypoxia and suggest that a glucose requirement in cellular metabolism is associated with HIF1α translation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover OncologySame topicCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207