MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403840614 · doi:10.1063/5.0230896

Influences of blockage ratio and Reynolds number on the spatiotemporal dynamics around a rectangular prism

2024· article· en· W4403840614 on OpenAlexafffund
Fati Bio Abdul-Salam, Xingjun Fang, Mark F. Tachie

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsPhysicsReynolds numberDynamics (music)MechanicsPrismFlow visualizationAspect ratio (aeronautics)Flow (mathematics)Classical mechanicsStatistical physicsOpticsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Particle image velocimetry is used to experimentally investigate the influence of blockage ratio (BR) and Reynolds number (Re) on the turbulent flow around a rectangular prism with depth-to thickness ratio of 3. The prism was selected because it falls within the intermediate regime where the turbulent dynamics is sensitive to the incoming boundary condition. The tested blockage ratios were 2.5%, 5%, and 10% at Reynold numbers of 3000 and 7500. The results are analyzed in terms of the mean flow, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), frequency spectra, reverse flow area, as well as spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD). The results indicate that as blockage ratio and/or Reynolds number increase, the tendency of reattachment of the separated shear layer onto the surface of the prism increases while the location of maximum TKE over the prism shifts toward the leading edge, indicating earlier transition of the separated shear layer from laminar to turbulence. For the cases without mean reattachment over the side faces of the prisms, the separated bubble over and downstream of the prism exhibits strong tendency of synchronization in terms of the instantaneous areas of the flow reversal, suggesting a global instability mechanism encompassing the entire prism. In cases with mean flow reattachment, conversely, the low-frequency flapping motion manifests over the prism. SPOD analysis further shows that the relevant shedding dynamics are captured in the first mode and the von Kármán shedding structures have the highest energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207