MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403843323 · doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2024.108152

Azaspiracid-59 accumulation and transformation in mussels (Mytilus edulis) after feeding with Azadinium poporum (Dinophyceae)

2024· article· en· W4403843323 on OpenAlexaff
Bernd Krock, Elizabeth Mudge, A. Hermann Müller, Stefanie Meyer, Jan Tebben, Pearse McCarron, Doris Abele, Urban Tillmann

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicon · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Toxins and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationHanyang UniversityUniversity of Washington
KeywordsDinophyceaeMytilusBiologyTransformation (genetics)FisheryZoologyBivalviaOceanographyEcologyMolluscaGeologyPhytoplankton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Azaspiracid-59 (AZA-59) was detected in plankton in coastal waters of the Pacific Northwest USA. Given that bivalves metabolize and transform accumulated phycotoxins, a strain of Azadinium poporum isolated from the coast of Washington State that is a known producer of AZA-59 was used in a controlled feeding experiment with mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) to assess AZA-59 accumulation rates and transformation into shellfish metabolites. Mussels started feeding immediately after the addition of A. poporum . Mussels were generally healthy during the entire experimental exposure of 18 days with prevailingly high rates of clearance (approx. 100 mL per mussel per hour) and ingestion. Mussels were extracted after different exposure times and were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with low- and high-resolution mass spectrometry. In the course of the experiment a number of putative AZA-59 metabolites were detected including hydroxyl and carboxy analogues that corresponded with previously reported mussel metabolites of AZA-1. A significant formation of 3-OH fatty acid acyl esters relative to free AZAs was observed through the time course of the study, with numerous fatty acid ester variants of AZA-59 confirmed. These results illustrate the potential for metabolism of AZA-59 in shellfish and provide important information for local AZA monitoring and toxicity testing along the Northern Pacific US coast. • AZA-59 is metabolized by mussels as AZA-1/2, but additional unreported mussel metabolites of AZA-59 were detected. • Seven novel AZA variants were detected and characterized by mass spectrometry. • Content of various 3-OH fatty acid esters was higher relative to free AZAs. • During 18 days, unesterified AZAs plateaued whereas a constant increase of AZA-59 esters was observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToxiconSame topicMarine Toxins and Detection MethodsFrench-language works237,207