MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403846150 · doi:10.1002/cam4.70359

Differential Radiomics‐Based Signature Predicts Lung Cancer Risk Accounting for Imaging Parameters in <scp>NLST</scp> Cohort

2024· article· en· W4403846150 on OpenAlexafffund
Leyla Ebrahimpour, Philippe Desprès, Venkata Manem

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Cancer InstituteFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéInstitut de Valorisation des Données
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceFeature selectionSupport vector machineBoosting (machine learning)Computer scienceRadiomicsCross-validationMedicineReceiver operating characteristicLung cancerPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with most cases diagnosed at advanced stages. Hence, there is a need to develop effective predictive models for early detection. This study aims to investigate the impact of imaging parameters and delta radiomic features from temporal scans on lung cancer risk prediction. METHODS: Using the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) within a nested case-control study involving 462 positive screenings, radiomic features were extracted from temporal computed tomography (CT) scans and harmonized with ComBat method to adjust variations in slice thickness category (TC) and reconstruction kernel type (KT). Both harmonized and non-harmonized features from baseline (T0), delta features between T0 and a year later (T1), and combined T0 and delta features were utilized for the analysis. Feature reduction was done using LASSO, followed by five feature selection (FS) methods and nine machine learning (ML) models, evaluated with 5-fold cross-validation repeated 10 times. Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to address class imbalances for lung cancer risk prediction. RESULTS: Models using delta features outperformed baseline features, with SMOTE consistently boosting performance when using combination of baseline and delta features. TC-based harmonized features improved performance with SMOTE, but overall, harmonization did not significantly enhance the model performance. The highest test score of 0.76 was achieved in three scenarios: delta features with a Gradient Boosting (GB) model (TC-based harmonization and MultiSurf FS); and T0 + delta features, with both a Support Vector Classifier (SVC) model (KT-based harmonization and F-test FS), and an XGBoost (XGB) model (TC-based harmonization and Mutual Information (MI) FS), all using SMOTE. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the significance of delta radiomic features and balanced datasets to improve lung cancer prediction. While our findings are based on a subsample of NLST data, they provide a valuable foundation for further exploration. Further research is needed to assess the impact of harmonization on imaging-derived models. Future investigations should explore advanced harmonization techniques and additional imaging parameters to develop robust radiomics-based biomarkers of lung cancer risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer MedicineSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207