MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403847323 · doi:10.1016/j.greeac.2024.100168

Coupling solid phase microextraction to integrated optical sensors with microfluidic open interface

2024· article· en· W4403847323 on OpenAlexafffund
Emir Nazdrajić, Victor A. Galievsky, Janusz Pawliszyn

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Analytical Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrofluidicsSolid-phase microextractionInterface (matter)Coupling (piping)Materials sciencePhase (matter)NanotechnologyChromatographyChemistryGas chromatography–mass spectrometryMass spectrometryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Simple integration of microfluidic open interface with UV/Vis absorption detection. • Rapid sensor readout for solid-phase microextraction devices. • Cost-effective system for screening of dyes in water enhancer solution. Increasing number of regulations today is very demanding, so many fields need to rely to screening techniques to separate samples whose content need to be confirmed with that field's gold standard approach. Therefore, the development of simple and fast approaches is very much needed. This manuscript presents the development of a microfluidic open interface integrated with ultraviolet-visible (UV–Vis) absorption detection for rapid screening applications. The system was designed as a rapid sensor readout for compounds enriched by solid-phase microextraction devices. Two azo dyes from a liquid water enhancer solution served as model analytes. These two dyes were extracted with the solid phase microextraction fiber and introduced to the system for analysis. Experimental results demonstrated that the system could effectively detect dyes with absorbance at 403 nm, indicating its potential for quantitating analytes with UV–Vis chromophores. Although this sensing method exhibits limited selectivity, it offers a cost-effective, straightforward approach to rapid screening that can be conveniently miniaturized for on-site applications. Further advances could focus on integrating low-cost sensors with specific responses in place of the UV–Vis unit, as well as simplification and miniaturization of the system to improve on-site analysis. Additionally, incorporating autosampler systems could enable high-throughput determinations, broadening the method's applicability. The developed solid phase microextraction method reliably samples and enriches small molecules from complex systems, delivering clean extracts to the selective sensor for readout without interference from the investigated sample matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreen Analytical ChemistrySame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207