MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403848157 · doi:10.1016/j.srs.2024.100173

A comprehensive evaluation of satellite-based and reanalysis soil moisture products over the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia

2024· article· en· W4403848157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience of Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural basinSatelliteEnvironmental scienceMoistureHydrology (agriculture)GeographyGeologyMeteorologyEngineeringGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil moisture data is crucial for enhancing drought monitoring, optimizing water management, refining irrigation schedules, forecasting floods, and understanding climate change impacts. Despite the existence of long-term global satellite and reanalysis products, the performance of global satellite products in Ethiopia is underexplored, highlighting a need for comprehensive assessments to effectively utilize these resources and address critical environmental challenges. This research evaluates various operational satellites and reanalysis soil moisture datasets over the Gilgel Abay watershed. The datasets include the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative Soil Moisture (ESA-CCI SM), Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive mission (SMAP Enhanced), the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Fifth Generation Reanalysis (ECMWF ERA5), Climate Forecast System reanalysis (CFSRv2), NASA's Short-term Prediction Research and Transition Center - Land Information System (SPoRT-LIS), and NASA's Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS). After applying bias correction, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample t-tests, Bonferroni correction, and statistical error metrics, the evaluation reveals that all products, except NASA-GLDAS, effectively capture soil moisture dynamics. SMAP shows superior temporal dynamics, followed by SMOS, ESA-CCI, CFSRv2, LIS and ERA5. Using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r s ), SMAP (r s = 0.68) and SMOS (r s = 0.67) identified as the most accurate soil moisture products, with SMOS excelling in spatial representation and closely aligning with the Topographic Wetness Index (TWI). However, the lack of sufficient in situ monitoring networks limits the ability to perform a thorough evaluation. Establishing these networks is essential for improving satellite retrievals and modelling in the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. • The research critically examines the global soil moisture datasets in Ethiopia. • SMAP excels in temporal dynamics, with SMOS closely aligning to the Topographic Wetness Index. • In situ monitoring is key to improving soil moisture data retrieval and modelling in the Blue Nile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it