MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403855403 · doi:10.5539/apr.v16n2p131

Elastic Natures of the Two Kinds of Particles Related to a Mass: The Masson and the Photon

2024· article· en· W4403855403 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Zareski

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotonMaterials scienceTwo-photon excitation microscopyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1920 Einstein wrote (Cf. Sec. I.1) space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time. It follows that the existence of a particular ether permits to define the notions of time and space developed further below. This particular ether one is an elastic medium submitted to only densities of couples, and is called "ether(or)": (or) for only rotates. In the present paper, I prove how a mass is related to a field and what the constitution of that field is. The lines of this proof are based on the fact that, even when it is immobile, a mass is related to a frequency by the relation . This shows that a mass creates a field of frequency propagated in the ether. The nature of such a field is that it is an ensemble of points in the ether only rotating on themselves such that the axes of these rotations are situated on any line passing through the center of this mass. I prove that the photon possesses a specific mass that vanishes when it becomes immobile for example on a Schwarzschild horizon. Indeed, since a large mass as the sun deviates the light trajectory that passes in its neighborhood, it follows that the photon possesses a moving mass proportional to its frequency. Indeed, if the photon would not possess any moving mass how could the photon trajectory been deviated by the sun, this photon being emitted by another source as for example another star The answer to those that pretend that, it is the space which is linearly deformed is the following: if the space would be linearly deformed then we would not be able to define the notions of emplacement, distance, propagation of the light, and of time duration. This fact is confirmed by considering Einstein's reasoning following with the ether is not linearly deformed but that its points can only pivot. Now, the photon possesses an energy that is as to possess a mass defined by that will be attracted by another mass as for example the sun. Such an attraction will cause to photon trajectories to be deviated, and in certain cases, to enter in the Schwarzschild horizon were it would be absorbed. The photon possesses an "only-moving-mass" that causes its submission to the gravitational attraction, for example due to a large immobile mass. The photon mass is called: only-moving-mass, because as shown here below, the photon mass disappears together with the photon when it stops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207