AtTOC159 Receptors are Targeted to the Chloroplast Outer Membrane by a β-Signal and Galactolipid-Specific Transit Peptide-Like Sequence at the C-Terminus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chloroplasts, the essential organelles responsible for photosynthesis, rely on the coordinated import of nuclear-encoded proteins for their biogenesis and function. TOC159 receptors are critical components of the translocon at the outer membrane of chloroplasts (TOC complex), responsible for recognizing and importing preproteins. However, the mechanisms by which TOC159 itself is targeted and integrated into the chloroplast outer envelope are only partially understood. In this study, we explore the structural aspects of the C-terminal membrane (M) domain of Arabidopsis thaliana TOC159, with a focus on its role in chloroplast outer envelope targeting and TOC complex integration. Structural predictions using AlphaFold and far-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy experiments suggested that the M domain forms an integral β-barrel that fuses with the β-barrel of TOC75, forming a hybrid channel at the chloroplast outer envelope. We identified a novel bi-partite targeting signal within the M domain, composed of a C-terminal β-signal with the consensus sequence G-Q-Φ-[ST]-Φ-[RK]-X-[SN]-[ST] and a transit peptide (TP)-like sequence. Using fluorescence microscopy and mutational analyses, we demonstrated that the β-signal is essential for chloroplast targeting, while the TP-like sequence enhances targeting ejiciency. Furthermore, CD spectroscopy and Langmuir-Blodgett trough experiments revealed that the TP-like sequence preferentially interacts with galactolipids unique to the chloroplast outer membrane, particularly sulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol (SQDG), facilitating chloroplast outer envelope targeting specificity. Overall, our findings provide a deeper understanding of TOC159 receptor targeting mechanisms, TOC complex biogenesis and highlight the broader significance of lipid-mediated targeting in intracellular protein trajicking. These results pave the way for future studies on the role of TP-like sequences in chloroplast outer membrane protein targeting and other novel targeting pathways more generally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".