MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403857259 · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad8c6c

Projecting atmospheric N<sub>2</sub>O rise until the end of the 21st century: an Earth System Model study

2024· article· en· W4403857259 on OpenAlexafffund
Makcim De Sisto, Christopher J. Somes, Angela Landolfi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEarth (classical element)Earth system scienceEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesAstrobiologyEarth scienceClimatologyMeteorologyGeologyGeographyPhysicsAstronomyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nitrous Oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas with a centennial-scale lifetime that contributes significantly to global warming. It is emitted from natural and anthropogenic sources. In nature, N2O is released mainly from nitrification and denitrification from the ocean and terrestrial systems. The use of agricultural fertilizers has significantly increased the emission of N2O in the past century. Here we present, to our knowledge, the first coupled ocean and terrestrial N2O modules within an Earth System Model. The coupled modules were used to simulate the six Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) scenarios with available nitrogen fertilizer inputs. Our results are compared to projections of atmospheric N2O concentrations used for SSPs scenario experiments. Additionally, an extra set of simulations were prescribed with emulated N2O concentrations available as input in Shared Socioeconomic Pathways scenarios. We report four main drivers for terrestrial N2O uncertainties: atmospheric temperature, agricultural fertilizer input, soil denitrification and agricultural model dynamics. We project an atmospheric N2O concentration range from 401 to 418 ppb in six SSPs simulations with a robust lack of sensitivity to equilibrium climate sensitivity. We found a large difference between our low emission scenarios N2O concentrations by 2100 compared to the concentration provided for SSPs experiments. This divergence is likely explained by strong mitigation assumptions that were not accounted for in this study, which would require a substantial decrease of agricultural N2O emissions. The coupled model and the simulations prescribed with N2O concentrations showed a difference between −0.02 and 0.09 ∘C by 2100. Our model simulation shows a lack of sensitivity to climate mitigation efforts projecting similar N2O concentration in low and high mitigation scenarios, that could indicate the need of further development of agricultural model dynamics. Further improvements in Earth system models should focus on the impact of oxygen decline on N2O dynamics in the ocean and the representation of anaerobic soils and agricultural dynamics on land, including mitigation methods on nitrogen fertilizers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207