MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403859485 · doi:10.1124/dmd.124.001893

Uncovering the impact of COVID-19–mediated bidirectional dysregulation of cytochrome P450 3A4 on systemic and pulmonary drug concentrations using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling

2024· article· en· W4403859485 on OpenAlexafffund
Chukwunonso K. Nwabufo

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Metabolism and Disposition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsOntario Tobacco Research UnitCollege of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario
FundersLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsPharmacokineticsCYP3A4DrugCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PharmacologySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)ChemistryComputational biologyBiologyMedicineCytochrome P450EnzymeDiseaseBiochemistryInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several clinical studies have shown that COVID-19 increases the systemic concentration of drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. However, it is unclear how COVID-19-mediated bidirectional dysregulation of hepatic and pulmonary cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 affects drug concentrations, especially in the lung tissue, which is most affected by the disease. Herein, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to demonstrate the differences in systemic and pulmonary concentrations of 4 respiratory infectious disease drugs when CYP3A4 is concurrently downregulated in the liver and upregulated in the lung based on existing clinical data on COVID-19-CYP3A4 interactions at varying severity levels including outpatients, non-intensive care unit (ICU), and ICU patients. The study showed that hepatic metabolism is the primary determinant of both systemic and pulmonary drug concentrations despite the concurrent bidirectional dysregulation of liver and lung CYP3A4. ICU patients had the most systemic and pulmonary drug exposure, with a percentage increase in the area under the concentration-time curve in the plasma compartment of approximately 44%, 56%, 114%, and 196% for clarithromycin, nirmatrelvir, dexamethasone, and itraconazole, respectively, relative to the healthy group. Within the ICU cohort, clarithromycin exhibited its highest exposure in lung tissue mass with a fold change of 1189, whereas nirmatrelvir and dexamethasone showed their highest exposure in the plasma compartment, with fold changes of about 126 and 5, respectively, compared with the maximum therapeutic concentrations for their target pathogens. Itraconazole was significantly underexposed in the lung fluid compartment, potentially explaining its limited efficacy for the treatment of COVID-19. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing dosing regimens in at risk ICU patients to enhance both efficacy and safety profiles. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study investigated whether COVID-19-mediated concurrent hepatic downregulation and pulmonary upregulation of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 leads to differences in the systemic and pulmonary concentrations of 4 respiratory medicines. The study demonstrated that intercompartmental differences in drug concentrations were driven by only hepatic CYP3A4 expression. This work suggests that ICU patients with significant COVID-19-CYP3A4 interactions may be at risk of clinically relevant COVID-19-drug interactions, highlighting the need for optimizing dosing regimens in this patient group to improve safety and efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDrug Metabolism and DispositionSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207