MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403865900 · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ad8222

Non-monotonic dynamic correlation explored via active microrheology

2024· article· en· W4403865900 on OpenAlexaff
Ata Madanchi, F Aghaei, S. H. Ebrahimnazhad Rahbari, M. Reza Rahimi Tabar, Thorsten Pöschel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrorheologyMonotonic functionStatistical physicsCorrelationComputer sciencePhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysisThermodynamicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the study of local and heterogeneous structures in supercooled liquids, microrheology plays a crucial role, offering a closer examination of the mechanical properties at a local level. We concentrate on active microrheology, where an external force drives a probe particle. This technique is employed in the study of a Kob–Andersen mixture, using extensive molecular dynamics simulations. Through active microrheology, we analyze the positional dependence of viscosity, observing how probe particles respond to activation velocity. Utilizing advanced stochastic analysis, we disentangle the deterministic and stochastic components of the local viscosity time series, characterizing its nonlinear and intermittent properties, which indicate heterogeneity. We construct a Langevin equation to model the dynamics of local viscosity and derive its drift and diffusion coefficients from simulation data. Additionally, we investigate the temperature-dependent variations of viscosity dynamics, unveiling their multiplicative and nonlinear nature. We elaborate on how the existence of multiplicative dynamics in viscosity results in the characteristic emergence of heterogeneity within viscosity dynamics. We derive a dynamic correlation length from local viscosity. Moreover, this correlation length shows a non-monotonic dependence on temperature with a maximum at about the Kauzmann temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and ExperimentSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207