MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403867363 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000040242

Cronkhite-Canada syndrome: A case report and literature review

2024· review· en· W4403867363 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nanping Wang, Yue Xiang, Liping Tao, Ming Wen, Lijun Ren, Tao Huang, Guodong Yang, Ren Quan, Peng Zhu, Min Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineDiarrheaGlossitisColonoscopyWeight lossEsophagusEmaciationStomachCapsule endoscopyDermatologyPathologyTongueColorectal cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) is a nonhereditary, rare polyposis condition, first documented by Cronkhite and Canada in 1955. The primary distinct features of this syndrome include ectodermal abnormalities and diffuse gastrointestinal polyp changes accompanied by protein loss. The primary clinical manifestations of CCS include hair loss, excessive pigmentation of the skin, and malnourishment of fingernails or toenails. Other notable symptoms include weight loss, protein-losing enteropathy, diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, taste abnormalities, and atrophic glossitis, which predominantly occur in middle-aged and older males. CCS is characterized by an extremely rare, nonfamilial hamartomatous polyposis syndrome, in which polyps are distributed in the stomach and colon (90%), small intestine(80%), and rectum (67%), while sparing the esophagus. PATIENT CONCERNS: This report describes a 72-year-old female, initially treated for intestinal obstruction, followed by a small intestine resection. She reported diarrhea, emaciation, and loss of appetite across various hospitals. DIAGNOSES: Endoscopic examination of the stomach and colon, plus capsule endoscopy, revealed multiple polyps throughout her gastrointestinal tract, except in the esophagus. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment included hormones with antiallergic medication, acid-suppressing drugs, salicylates, and nutritional support with zinc sulfate, adding trace elements and amino acids. OUTCOMES: posttreatment, the patient demonstrated significant improvement in appetite and taste. Atrophic glossitis, upper limb pigmentation, and frequency of diarrhea also notably decreased. reexamination through endoscopy after 3 months of treatment revealed a substantial decrease in the number and size of gastrointestinal polyps. LESSONS: In this case, from the lower esophageal sphincter to the rectum, there is an increasing trend of eosinophil and mast cell infiltration. These lesions can cause a positive IgG result. Pathological analysis indicates that the extent and severity of lesions in the middle and lower gastrointestinal tract are more substantial than in the upper tract. During treatment, endoscopic observations reveal that lesions in the middle and lower tract tend to resolve faster than those in the upper tract. Hormone therapy has demonstrated significant efficacy in treating this disease. Early treatment and regular follow-up for this disease can reduce the risk of cancerous changes and related complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207