MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403868539 · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1376551

First-in-human phase 1 dose-escalation results with livmoniplimab, an antibody targeting the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex, as monotherapy and in combination with the anti–PD-1 antibody budigalimab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2024· article· en· W4403868539 on OpenAlexaff
Toshio Shimizu, John D. Powderly, Albiruni Abdul Razak, Patricia LoRusso, Kathy D. Miller, Steven Kao, Sarah Kongpachith, Catherine Tribouley, Michelle Graham, Brian R. Stoll, Maulik Patel, Mohammad Sahtout, Martha Blaney, Rachel S. Leibman, Talia Golan, Anthony W. Tolcher

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTGF-β signaling in diseases
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersDaiichi Sankyo EuropeMersana TherapeuticsEMD SeronoSK Life SciencePfizerMerck KGaAGenentechLes Laboratories Pierre FabreBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyAstraZenecaAptitude Health
KeywordsMedicineNauseaCombination therapyAdverse effectInternal medicinePharmacokineticsAntibodyPharmacologyAnemiaMonoclonal antibodyOncologyGastroenterologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 is a pleiotropic cytokine that can promote tumor growth and suppress antitumor immune responses. Latent TGF-ß1 associates with glycoprotein-A repetition predominant (GARP) on the surface of regulatory T cells prior to its activation and release. Livmoniplimab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex to inhibit activation and release of TGF-ß1. It is in clinical development in combination with budigalimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 Fc-modified mAb. The first-in-human, phase 1, dose-escalation results are presented herein (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03821935). Methods: The dose-escalation phase enrolled adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received escalating doses of livmoniplimab ranging from 3mg to 1500mg, once every 2 weeks (Q2W), as monotherapy or in combination with a 500mg fixed dose of budigalimab Q4W. The primary objective of the dose escalation was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives were to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (PK), and exploratory objectives included evaluating preliminary efficacy. Results: Fifty-seven patients enrolled in the dose escalation: 23 in monotherapy cohorts and 34 in combination therapy cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicities were limited, no maximum tolerated dose was reached, and the maximum administered dose of 1500mg was selected for dose expansion. The most common adverse events reported in monotherapy-treated patients were fatigue, anemia, and nausea, and those in combination therapy-treated patients were pruritus, fatigue, nausea, and anemia. Livmoniplimab exhibited dose-proportional PK, and peripheral blood biomarker data demonstrated saturation of the GARP:TGF-ß1 complex on platelets at livmoniplimab doses within the linear PK range. No objective tumor responses were observed in the monotherapy dose escalation. However, the objective response rate was 15% in the combination dose escalation, with a median response duration of 8.4 months. Conclusion: Livmoniplimab was well-tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with budigalimab in the dose-escalation phase. Encouraging preliminary efficacy was demonstrated in the combination dose escalation in heavily pretreated patients, supporting further development of this novel drug combination in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in OncologySame topicTGF-β signaling in diseasesFrench-language works237,207