Rice Leaf Disease Classification—A Comparative Approach Using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Cascading Autoencoder with Attention Residual U-Net (CAAR-U-Net), and MobileNet-V2 Architectures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Classifying rice leaf diseases in agricultural technology helps to maintain crop health and to ensure a good yield. In this work, deep learning algorithms were, therefore, employed for the identification and classification of rice leaf diseases from images of crops in the field. The initial algorithmic phase involved image pre-processing of the crop images, using a bilateral filter to improve image quality. The effectiveness of this step was measured by using metrics like the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and the Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR). Following this, this work employed advanced neural network architectures for classification, including Cascading Autoencoder with Attention Residual U-Net (CAAR-U-Net), MobileNetV2, and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The proposed CNN model stood out, since it demonstrated exceptional performance in identifying rice leaf diseases, with test Accuracy of 98% and high Precision, Recall, and F1 scores. This result highlights that the proposed model is particularly well suited for rice leaf disease classification. The robustness of the proposed model was validated through k-fold cross-validation, confirming its generalizability and minimizing the risk of overfitting. This study not only focused on classifying rice leaf diseases but also has the potential to benefit farmers and the agricultural community greatly. This work highlights the advantages of custom CNN models for efficient and accurate rice leaf disease classification, paving the way for technology-driven advancements in farming practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".