MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Salt Based or BaLanced SolUtion–Trends Existing in Indian Intensive Care Units: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study (SOLUTE Study)

2024· article· en· W4403875526 on OpenAlexaff
Yatin Mehta, Deepak Govil, Kapil Zirpe, Divya Pal, Akhil Taneja, Pratibha Dileep, Mehul Shah, Subhal Dixit, Anand Gupta, Sachin Gupta, Naveen Paliwal, Sweta J Patel, Deeksha Singh Tomar, Pooja R. Murthy, Sarala Kumari Daram, Rajeeb Kumar Mishra, Pooja Bihani, Anuj M Clerk, Krunalkumar Patel, Siva Kumar Reddy Lakkireddygari, Adarsh Singamsetty, Kapildev Thakkar, Lakshmikanthcharan Saravana Bavan, Sourabh Ambapkar, Saanvi Ambapkar, Y P Singh, Suparna Bharadwaj

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyIntensive care medicineCohort studyProspective cohort studyIntensive careCohortPediatricsEmergency medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Fluid administration is a commonly practiced intervention in the intensive care unit (ICU) with normal saline being the preferred fluid. We sought to understand the current practice of fluid administration and choice of fluids in Indian ICUs and its effect on renal outcomes. Materials and methods: The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM)-endorsed multicenter prospective observational study was conducted on practice of fluid administration in critically ill patients between May 1, 2020, and January 31, 2023. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. Results: < 0.001). Conclusion: Balanced salt solution is the preferred intravenous fluid with a safe renal profile among critically ill patients. The AKI patients had shorter hospital and ICU LOS with BSS as compared to NS. How to cite this article: Salt Based or BaLanced SolUtion-Trends Existing in Indian Intensive Care Units: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study (SOLUTE Study). Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(11):1028-1037.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of Critical Care MedicineSame topicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207