Design and Practice of Ideological and Political Education of Environmental Engineering Principles Course Based on OBE Concept
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explore the design and practice path of ideological and political education (IPE) of environmental engineering principles course based on OBE concept, so as to realize the organic integration of professional courses and IPE. In this article, a systematic IPE design of the course of environmental engineering principles is carried out, and it is verified through teaching practice. The results show that the teaching design can improve students' professional literacy and ideological literacy, and cultivate their environmental awareness and social responsibility. Furthermore, we also found that the integration of instructional content and some ideological elements is not close enough, and instructional methods and means need further innovation. In view of these problems, this article puts forward corresponding improvement suggestions and looks forward to the follow-up research direction. This research is of great practical significance for promoting the connotative development of tertiary education and realizing the deep integration of professional courses and IPE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it