MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403879902 · doi:10.1101/2024.10.28.620699

Neuroligin 3 highlights sexually dimorphic circuitry in Drosophila social spacing

2024· preprint· en· W4403879902 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Wesley Robinson, Allison R. Bechard, Mary Evans, Judy M. Kurbaj, K Mosuro, Joshua Isaacson, S Pillay, Daren Lin, Amrik Sahota, JN de Belle, Giles Robinson, Amanda J. Moehring, Anne F. Simon

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSexual dimorphismNeuroliginDrosophila (subgenus)BiologyNeuroscienceEvolutionary biologyGeneticsZoologyGeneExcitatory postsynaptic potential

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In Drosophila melanogaster , the autism-related Neuroligin 3 (Nlg3) protein is a postsynaptic membrane protein important for synapse development and regulation, which plays a role in social spacing behaviour. Here, we report the localization of Nlg3 to the calyx of the mushroom bodies (MB), optic lobes (OL), and protocerebral bridge (PB). Using RNA interference, nlg3 knockdown in each of these structures recapitulated the effect of knocking down it in all nlg-3 neurons. Hyperactivation and silencing of these neurons in the MB, but not the PB, controls social space in males and females, while hyperactivating and silencing of all nlg3 -expressing neurons, including within the MB, PB, and OL, regulates male and female social space. Knocking down neurotransmitter biosynthesis enzymes, which decreases the amount of neurotransmitter release, showed that reducing acetylcholine release from the MB decreased female social space, whereas knocking down any dopamine receptor in the MB increased male social space. Lastly, to investigate the sexually dimorphic effects on social spacing previously seen in nlg3 mutants, we examined a subset of sexually dimorphic fruitless- expressing ( fru)P1 neurons known to regulate sexually dimorphic behaviours. Hyperactivation of those fruP1 neurons decreased social space in both sexes, while silencing those fruP1 neurons specifically increased male social space without affecting females. Our findings highlight a sex-specific social space neural circuitry that includes the OL, MB, and fruP1 neurons, while uncovering the underlying basis of some of the sex differences in this behaviour. Article Summary In vinegar flies ( Drosophila melanogaster ), the autism-related Neuroligin 3 protein (Nlg3) controls neuronal development and regulation but also affects fly social behaviour. Nlg3 is localized to the mushroom bodies (MB), protocerebral bridge, and the optic lobes. We show that those structures are important in determining social space in a sex dependant manner. In addition, reducing acetylcholine release from the MB affects female social space, while reducing dopamine receptors of the MB only affect male behaviour. Finally, the fruitless sexually dimorphic neurons control social behavior differently in males and females.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research→French-language works237,207→