MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403891519 · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03897-7

FARFUM-RoP, A dataset for computer-aided detection of Retinopathy of Prematurity

2024· article· en· W4403891519 on OpenAlexaff
Morteza Akbari, Hamid Reza Pourreza, Elias Khalili Pour, Afsar Dastjani Farahani, Fatemeh Bazvand, Nazanin Ebrahimiadib, Marjan Imani Fooladi, F. K.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinopathy of prematurityComputer scienceMedicineGestational ageBiologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) is a critical eye disorder affecting premature infants, characterized by abnormal blood vessel development in the retina. Plus Disease, indicating severe ROP progression, plays a pivotal role in diagnosis. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have shown parity with or surpass human experts in ROP detection, especially Plus Disease. However, the success of AI systems depends on high-quality datasets, emphasizing the need for collaboration and data sharing among researchers. To address this challenge, the paper introduces a new public dataset, FARFUM-RoP (Farabi and Ferdowsi University of Mashhad's ROP dataset), comprising 1533 ROP fundus images from 68 patients, annotated independently by five experienced childhood ophthalmologists as "Normal," "Pre-Plus," or "Plus." Ethical principles and consent were meticulously followed during data collection. The paper presents the dataset structure, patient details, and expert labels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicRetinopathy of Prematurity StudiesFrench-language works237,207