Revealing host genome–microbiome networks underlying feed efficiency in dairy cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ruminants have the ability to digest human-inedible plant materials, due to the symbiotic relationship with the rumen microbiota. Rumen microbes supply short chain fatty acids, amino acids, and vitamins to dairy cows that are used for maintenance, growth, and lactation functions. The main goal of this study was to investigate gene-microbiome networks underlying feed efficiency traits by integrating genotypic, microbial, and phenotypic data from lactating dairy cows. Data consisted of dry matter intake (DMI), net energy secreted in milk, and residual feed intake (RFI) records, SNP genotype, and 16S rRNA rumen microbial abundances from 448 mid-lactation Holstein cows. We first assessed marginal associations between genotypes and phenotypic and microbial traits through genomic scans, and then, in regions with multiple significant hits, we assessed gene-microbiome-phenotype networks using causal structural learning algorithms. We found significant regions co-localizing the rumen microbiome and feed efficiency traits. Interestingly, we found three types of network relationships: (1) the cow genome directly affects both rumen microbial abundances and feed efficiency traits; (2) the cow genome (Chr3: 116.5 Mb) indirectly affects RFI, mediated by the abundance of Syntrophococcus, Prevotella, and an unknown genus of Class Bacilli; and (3) the cow genome (Chr7: 52.8 Mb and Chr11: 6.1-6.2 Mb) affects the abundance of Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group mediated by DMI. Our findings shed light on how the host genome acts directly and indirectly on the rumen microbiome and feed efficiency traits and the potential benefits of the inclusion of specific microbes in selection indexes or as correlated traits in breeding programs. Overall, the multistep approach described here, combining whole-genome scans and causal network reconstruction, allows us to reveal the relationship between genome and microbiome underlying dairy cow feed efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".