MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403892573 · doi:10.7202/1114084ar

Les services écosystémiques dans les programmes, les manuels et les ressources en ligne de SVT : une simple rationalisation positiviste du rapport de l’Homme à la Nature ?

2024· article· fr· W4403892573 on OpenAlex
Marco Barroca-Paccard, Sandrine Turcotte

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhronesis · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les nouveaux programmes de Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre (SVT) en Première générale incluent une section sur les services écosystémiques. L’objectif principal est de passer d’une approche anthropocentrée à une approche écocentrée, intégrant la notion de services écosystémiques (SE). Notre article propose une analyse épistémologique du concept de SE, examinant la définition, la diversité des exemples et services, le rôle de l’Homme dans l’environnement, la monétarisation et les liens avec l’éthique environnementale. L’analyse a été réalisée en utilisant un corpus constitué des programmes de SVT, des manuels scolaires et de ressources en ligne, mettant en évidence une diversité d’exemples et de documents abordant les SE. La discussion aborde la prise en charge de l’incertitude et de la complexité pour dépasser une rationalisation positiviste du rapport de l’Homme à la Nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it