Applicability of HEC-RAS and Geospatial Tools for Inland Waterways Transportation Corridor: Case Study of Ganga Basin, Bihar, India
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bihar has the largest networks of Rivers and drainage systems and most of them are perineal. Previously, north Bihar had active inland waterways transportation networks but these days the networks are not in use. Due to rapid urbanization and a hike in fuel prices, the transportation cost within the state has risen in the past few years. The demand for cheaper transportation systems is highly needed in these areas for goods transportation. Recently, the inland waterways authority of India has started a new shipping service in River Ganga only but a few more river networks can also be used for these kinds of activities. A study was conducted to find the inland waterways' potential for the development of a state river transportation corridor for North Bihar India. Various mathematical modeling tools such as HEC-RAS, HEC-HMS along with geospatial tools have been used for this study. The result obtained by the study indicates that the six more rivers of the states have the potential for inland waterways transportation along with suitable vessels for transportation. The methodology developed in the study is suitable for the development of waterways transportation corridors at various places. The study also emphasizes selecting the proper places for making the jetties which may be helpful for various activities such as disaster management, industrial fright services, logistic supply, etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it