MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403896093 · doi:10.1145/3677388.3696331

Adaptive Sub-stepping for Constrained Rigid Body Simulations

2024· article· en· W4403896093 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Giles, Sheldon Andrews

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTime steppingRigid bodyStepping stonePhysicsClassical mechanicsFinite element methodEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achieving stable simulation of constrained rigid body systems is a primary concern for many computer graphics applications, such as video games, robotic planning, and virtual reality training. In this paper, we present a novel adaptive sub-stepping scheme that achieves stable simulation by adaptively reducing the time step as needed. Our approach employs a diagonalized geometric stiffness matrix as a heuristic to determine when smaller time steps are required, and adjusts the number of sub-steps accordingly. Our method is straightforward to integrate into existing rigid body simulators, and further eliminates manually tuning the number of sub-steps required. We demonstrate the ability of our method to produce stable simulates at real-time frame rates using a number of challenging, complex examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207