The Relationship Between Professional Identity and Job Satisfaction Among Teachers at Newly Established Undergraduate Institutions: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amid the rapid development of higher education in China and the increasingly fierce competition among colleges, improving teachers’ job satisfaction has become a critical criterion for ensuring the sustainable development of newly established undergraduate institutions and meeting the growing demand for talent cultivation. In this study I explores the impact of professional identity and work engagement on job satisfaction among teachers of different genders and ages. Based on conservation of resources theory, I utilized multiple regression analysis to investigate 637 university teachers from five newly established undergraduate institutions in Hebei Province, China. The results indicate significant differences in professional identity, job satisfaction, and work engagement among teachers of different genders and ages, with female teachers scoring higher than male teachers, and older teachers scoring higher than younger teachers. Professional identity has a significantly positive effect on job satisfaction and work engagement. Additionally, work engagement plays a partial mediating role between professional identity and job satisfaction among teachers at newly established undergraduate institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it