MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403901316 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.202483028

Downhole Flow Measurement Technology Applied in Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery Wells. A Field Test Case

2024· article· en· W4403901316 on OpenAlexaff
P. G. Chiuchiarelli, M. Villambrosa, Diego Benítez, Fernando Guerrero, M. Álvarez, David Vivanco, J. M. Ferreyra, Daniela Verónica Renta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsCorporation d’Aménagement et de Protection de la Sainte-Anne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringOil fieldField (mathematics)Flow (mathematics)Test (biology)Well test (oil and gas)Computer scienceGeologyMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary For years, we have been searching for technology capable of measuring the full range of flows present in CEOR wells, regardless of the type of mechanical installation used. So far, each of the existing technologies covers a portion of the entire flow range. This is partially solved by combining more than one of these technologies to meet the objective. In different cases such technologies show complexity in their operational implementation, high-level maintenance, long-processing time and many of them imply a high cost. The results of the Radioactive Tracer Logging Principle in Secondary Recovery System are not the same in CEOR wells. The calculation method of the new technology considers the geometry of the installation, the rheology of the polymer solution and the conditions under which it is injected into the well, parameters that define the dynamics of the fluid in question. In this first stage, based on a total reference flow injected into the well, the relationship between the Average velocity and the Measured velocity (sphere´s velocity) is determined. The simplicity of this technology and the years of experience in its use make it pertinent to take on the challenge of solving this matter. At WENLEN we have developed a technology to adapt the Downhole Radioactive Tracer Logging Principle to measure flows in CEOR wells in a simple way. We have focused on two main points: replacing the radioactive cloud thought to be as a physical event with a body able to absorb a radioactive liquid, when it is traveling through the concentric annular geometry. For this reason, this body never makes contact with the injected polymer solution. The other point is defining a New Calculation Method as an outcome of fluid dynamic characteristics and the rheologies associated with different injected polymer solutions. WENLEN technology has simply solved the way to measure flows in CEOR wells regardless of their mechanical installation, by adapting the well-known Method of Downhole Radioactive Tracers Logging Systems. The immediate operational implementation is another advantage the technology has shown. The Field Test Case results developed in the Diadema Field (CAPSA) and the Pampa de Castillo-La Guitarra Field (CAPEX) are presented in this work with their associated conclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207