An improved geolocation methodology for spaceborne radar and lidar systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Geolocation and co-registration methodologies are essential for the accurate interpretation of observations from spaceborne remote sensors. In preparations for the Earth Cloud Aerosol and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE), here, we refine the definition of these techniques and present various examples of geolocation assessments. The geolocation methods build upon earlier work; however, they introduce several improvements that have increased the reliability of the geolocation accuracy. The EarthCARE active-sensor geolocation methods use coastlines and significant elevation gradients in both statistical and numerical ways. The effectiveness of the proposed geolocation methods was tested using the extensive record of CloudSat and CALIPSO observations. The EarthCARE active-sensor geolocation methods were effective in identifying and correcting a short period of CloudSat observations when the star tracker was not operating properly. In addition, the geolocation methods were able to reproduce the excellent geolocation record of the CloudSat and CALIPSO missions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".