MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403905349 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v4i1.641

Prototype of Fish Drying Device for the Production of Salted Fish Based on IoT

2024· article· en· W4403905349 on OpenAlexaff
Sri Rezeki, Novriyenni Novriyenni, Milli Alfhi Syari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFish <Actinopterygii>Production (economics)Internet of ThingsFisheryDried fishBusinessFood scienceEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceChemistryEmbedded systemBiologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prototype of the fish drying tool for the production of salted fish is designed to enhance efficiency and control in the salted fish drying process by utilizing IoT technology to monitor and regulate the drying environment conditions. The DHT22 sensor connected to port D5 is used to measure temperature and humidity inside the drying room. The data collected by this sensor is sent to a microcontroller connected to a relay to control the heater and DC fan, as well as a buzzer as a warning system if the room temperature exceeds 60° C. The Blynk application is used for a user interface that allows for the remote monitoring and adjustment of drying parameters via a smartphone. The test results show that this system is capable of maintaining the conditions for drying salted fish within optimal temperature and humidity ranges, thereby improving the quality and efficiency of the drying process. The integration of IoT technology in this device facilitates monitoring and control, as well as enhancing the overall effectiveness of the drying process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)Same topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207