MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403905561 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v4i1.585

Design of Gas Leakage Monitoring System Based on Android Application and NodeMCU ESP8266

2024· article· en· W4403905561 on OpenAlexaff
Nabil Fuadi, Achmad Fauzi, Husnul Khair

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT-based Smart Home Systems
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndroid (operating system)Operating systemComputer scienceLeakage (economics)Embedded systemAndroid application

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas leakage is a serious problem that can threaten public safety and health and cause significant material losses. This research aims to design and implement a gas leak monitoring system that can be accessed remotely based on Android applications and NodeMCU ESP8266. NodeMCU ESP8266 is chosen as the main microcontroller equipped with an MQ-2 gas sensor to detect the presence of hazardous gas. This research incorporates Internet of Things (IoT) technology to allow users to remotely monitor the condition of gas leaks, thereby increasing the level of safety in the use of gas in households or small industries. The hardware design includes the use of an MQ-2 gas sensor that is sensitive to certain gas concentrations, as well as setting up an ESP8266 NodeMCU to transmit detection data to a Firebase server for later access through an Android application. The Android application was developed using Android Studio with a focus on an intuitive user interface to monitor the status of gas leaks in real-time. he research methods used include system design, hardware and software implementation, and thorough system testing by simulating gas leak scenarios to test the reliability and response of the system. The results show that the system can detect gas leaks with high accuracy. It is expected that the system developed in this research can be a practical and effective solution in reducing the risk of accidents caused by gas leaks, as well as making a positive contribution in increasing awareness of the safety of gas use in the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)Same topicIoT-based Smart Home SystemsFrench-language works237,207