MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403905563 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v4i1.618

Simulation of Service Queue for Dental Doctor Patients at Kindergarten Hospital. IV 01.07.02 Binjai Using the Exponential Method

2024· article· en· W4403905563 on OpenAlexaff
Cindy Arsita Br Bangun, Akim Manaor Hara Pardede, Marto Sihombing

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExponential functionQueueMathematicsMedicineComputer scienceMathematical analysisComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the systems that can be simulated is a queue. The queuing system consists of a collection of customer servers, a queue that regulates service to customers. The utilization of queuing simulations is to optimize services by designing service resources so that services can be effective and efficient. In the queuing system there are several problems that often occur, for example queuing queues, the number of queues will cause problems such as bored customers, and discomfort will make customers dissatisfied with the service. The Application of the Exponensial Method in the Dentist Patient Service Queuing System There are 28 general populations in this study, namely all consumers at the Kesrem Binjai Hospital, while the target population is the population that is actually used as a data source for patients who queue at the Kesrem Binjai Hospital to get the best service. is the target population in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)Same topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207