Design of an Automatic Trash Can Wheel Robot with Bluetooth Navigation Control Through Smartphone Application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental cleanliness is an important aspect that must be maintained, especially in this modern era. The use of appropriate technology can help increase awareness of cleanliness, one of which is by developing automatic trash cans. This research designs and builds a mobile robot in the form of an automatic trash can that can be controlled via an Arduino Uno microcontroller using Bluetooth and controlled via a smartphone application. This research designs a mobile robot in the form of an automatic trash can that can be controlled via an Arduino Uno microcontroller with Bluetooth and a smartphone application. The system receives navigation commands from the app and uses ultrasonic sensors to detect objects in front of the trash can. The microcontroller processes the command and sensor data to drive the DC motor and servo motor. The servo motor opens and closes the trash can lid automatically when an object is detected at a certain distance. The test results show that this robot can move according to instructions from a smartphone and successfully open and close the trash can lid automatically when detecting objects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it