Decision Support System for Extracurricular Determination to Increase Student Involvement in Activities Outside the Classroom Using the AHP Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SMK Dharma Pancasila Medan is a private school located at Jl. Dr. T. Mansyur No.71 C Medan, Kel. PB Selayang. Currently, the selection of extracurricular activities at the school relies on a conventional manual system, lacking a formal system to identify the best extracurricular activities among the available options. This study aims to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to evaluate and prioritize extracurricular activities based on four main criteria: achievement, short-distance running, height, and discipline. The system is designed to provide objective and measurable recommendations, facilitating students in choosing the most suitable extracurricular activities to enhance their success in out-of-class activities. The research findings demonstrate that the DSS developed with the AHP method is effective in providing accurate recommendations and increasing student engagement in extracurricular activities. The analysis and assessment process using AHP results in more targeted decisions aligned with the goal of enhancing student involvement. Overall, the system not only aids students in optimal extracurricular selection but also contributes to the development of better extracurricular activity strategies at SMK Dharma Pancasila Medan. This research enriches educational theory and practice by offering practical solutions to the challenges in extracurricular selection and enhances the overall educational experience for students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".