Impact of Electrolyte Additives on the Lifetime of High Voltage NMC Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work involves improving the lifetime of lithium-ion cells during high voltage cycling using electrolyte additives. Three generations of electrolyte additives were investigated and screened in NMC442/graphite pouch cells using a 24 h voltage-hold protocol at 40 °C to accelerate oxidative reactions occurring at 4.4 V. Once promising additives and combinations were identified, they were then tested in cobalt-free NMC640/graphite cells for long-term cycling to upper cutoff voltages of 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5 V at temperatures of 20, 40, and 55 °C. Degradation mechanisms were probed using dV/dQ analysis, micro-X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The primary failure mode of cells held at high voltages is due to increase in cell impedance, which is correlated to the dissolution of transition metals, specifically manganese, originating from the positive electrode. We believe this dissolution is presumably due to the formation of a high impedance rock salt surface layer on the NMC positive electrode particles. Such deleterious outcomes can be limited by selecting an appropriate electrolyte additive package. It is hoped that this paper can provide a starting point for developing NMC Li-ion cells that can operate to voltages as high as 4.4 V and still display long lifetimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".