MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403910636 · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2024.10.021

Polycrystalline diamond aggregates and their role in Earth’s deep carbon cycle

2024· article· en· W4403910636 on OpenAlexaff
Dorrit E. Jacob, Richard A. Stern, Janina Czas, Magnus Reutter, Sandra Piazolo, Thomas Stachel

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarth (classical element)Carbon fibersCrystallitePolycrystalline diamondCarbon cycleDiamondGeologyMaterials scienceEarth scienceAstrobiologyMineralogyGeochemistryMetallurgyComposite materialPhysicsEcosystemComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polycrystalline diamond aggregates (PDAs) are small rocks composed mostly of diamond grains, but often containing also peridotitic, eclogitic and/or websteritic minerals as accessory phases. PDAs are formed rapidly in Earth’s mantle, and the diamonds preserve heterogeneity not often seen in monocrystalline diamond. Here, diamond grains from forty-three PDAs from the Venetia diamond mine (RSA) with grain-sizes < 1 mm are presented. They have heterogeneous and complex cathodoluminescence signatures that are best explained by multiple, separate diamond growth episodes from compositionally distinct COH fluids/melts. The diamonds show a large range of nitrogen concentrations (0.5 to 2,891 at. ppm), δ 15 N (−4.3 to + 16.8 ‰) and δ 13 C values (−27.8 to −7.6 ‰). The positive δ 15 N median of + 6.4 ‰ and negative δ 13 C median of −21.2 ‰ indicate derivation of the diamond-forming fluid from organic materials in subducted oceanic crust and lithosphere. Two PDAs have δ 13 C and δ 15 N values typical for Earth’s mantle. Thirty-three PDAs contain websteritic garnets, or peridotitic garnets and clinopyroxenes and/or micas. Unradiogenic εNd i values in the garnets (−15.9 to −29.7) and clinopyroxene (−8.3) and δ 18 O values of 6.49 to 8.09 ‰ in websteritic garnets are consistent with an origin from subducted altered oceanic crust and support the findings from N and C systematics in the diamonds. Nitrogen aggregation data for the diamonds range from 25 % to 100 %B and vary by as much as 60 % within some individual PDAs. We explain the geochemical and isotopic heterogeneity of diamonds and silicates as well as the complex cathodoluminescence features with a model of episodic melt/fluid −rock interaction involving a reducing asthenospheric melt in the cratonic roots or the thermal boundary layer. We suggest that large volumes of PDA are formed in the cratonic roots and thermal boundary layer by this mechanism, making them an important reservoir for carbon storage, which is corroborated with their locally high abundance (ca. 20 %) in some kimberlites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochimica et Cosmochimica ActaSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207