Influence of reactivated basement structures on evolving orogens: Along-strike diachronous Himalayan metamorphism in far west Nepal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Determining the geometry and evolution of a basal detachment and its influence on orogenesis is a challenging, but important, aspect to understanding orogenic evolution. The basal detachment of the Himalayan orogen in far west Nepal is presently segmented by a documented tear fault. New pressure-temperature-time-deformation paths from the Himalayan metamorphic core along the Seti Khola river transect were integrated to compare the tectonometamorphic evolution on either side of the basal detachment tear fault to outline its history. Peak metamorphic conditions of 645–745 °C and 0.85–1.1 GPa were reached in the Seti Khola Himalayan metamorphic core rocks during the Oligocene to earliest Miocene, 10–14 m.y. prior to equivalent along-strike rocks in the adjacent Karnali valley, which indicates segmentation of the Himalayan metamorphic core across the tear fault. We interpret the segmentation of the orogen to have been caused by the development of the tear fault in the basal detachment of the Himalayan orogen and differing ramp-flat geometries on either side. The segmentation and change in basal detachment geometry is consistent with the reactivation of an underthrusted Indian plate inherited basement structure, the Great Boundary Fault, during the Oligocene to earliest Miocene. The comparison of tectonometamorphic histories along-strike in far west Nepal highlights the basal detachment geometry through time and the need to consider the pre-orogenic structural features of the plates involved in orogenesis. This study reinforces the importance of combining tectonometamorphic studies with geophysical and geomorphological data to fully understand the causes of along-strike segmentation of orogenic systems through time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".