MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403916537 · doi:10.26508/lsa.202402831

PTPN1/2 inhibition promotes muscle stem cell differentiation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

2024· article· en· W4403916537 on OpenAlexafffund
Yiyang Liu, Shulei Li, Rebecca Robertson, Jules A Granet, Isabelle Aubry, Romina L. Filippelli, Michel L. Tremblay, Natasha C. Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueLife Science Alliance · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMuscular Dystrophy CanadaDefeat Duchenne CanadaStem Cell NetworkMcGill University
KeywordsDuchenne muscular dystrophyMuscular dystrophyCell biologyStem cellMyocyteChemistryBiologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a lethal disease caused by mutations in the DMD gene that encodes dystrophin. Dystrophin deficiency also impacts muscle stem cells (MuSCs), resulting in impaired asymmetric stem cell division and myogenic commitment. Using MuSCs from DMD patients and the DMD mouse model mdx , we found that PTPN1 phosphatase expression is up-regulated and STAT3 phosphorylation is concomitantly down-regulated in DMD MuSCs. To restore STAT3-mediated myogenic signaling, we examined the effect of K884, a novel PTPN1/2 inhibitor, on DMD MuSCs. Treatment with K884 enhanced STAT3 phosphorylation and promoted myogenic differentiation of DMD patient-derived MuSCs. In MuSCs from mdx mice, K884 treatment increased the number of asymmetric cell divisions, correlating with enhanced myogenic differentiation. Interestingly, the pro-myogenic effect of K884 is specific to human and murine DMD MuSCs and is absent from control MuSCs. Moreover, PTPN1/2 loss-of-function experiments indicate that the pro-myogenic impact of K884 is mediated mainly through PTPN1. We propose that PTPN1/2 inhibition may serve as a therapeutic strategy to restore the myogenic function of MuSCs in DMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLife Science AllianceSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207