Video-Based Respiratory Rate Estimation for Infants in the NICU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Non-contact respiratory rate estimation (RR) is highly desirable for infants because of their sensitive skin. We propose a novel RGB video-based RR estimation method for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) that can accurately measure the RR contact-less. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We utilize Eulerian video magnification (EVM) method and develop an adaptive peak prominence threshold value estimation method to address challenges of RR estimation (e.g., dark environments, shallow breathing, babies swaddled or under blankets). We recruited 13 infants recorded for 4 consecutive hours per case. We then evaluate the performance of the algorithm for several (i.e., 19 to 25) randomly selected videos, each lasting 1 minute, for each case. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients of the proposed method over manually and automatically selected ROIs are 0.91 (95%CI: [Formula: see text]) and 0.88 (95%CI: [Formula: see text]), indicating excellent and good reliability, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis of the proposed algorithm shows higher agreement between the estimated values via the proposed method and visually counted RR than the agreement between the RR obtained from the impedance sensors and reference RR, and agreement between a former EVM-based method and reference RR values. CONCLUSION: Our algorithm shows promising results for RR estimation in a real-life NICU environment under various conditions that can confound the estimation. CLINICAL IMPACT: We present a robust algorithm for non-contact neonatal respiratory rate monitoring, capable of performing well under various environmental lighting conditions in NICU, even when the infant is clothed or covered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".