MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403920083 · doi:10.1109/sm63044.2024.10733469

Performance Assessment of Vehicular Cloud Systems: An Analytical Approach Using M/G/m Queueing Model

2024· article· en· W4403920083 on OpenAlexaff
Farzaneh Abdolahi, Jelena Mišić, Vojislav B. Mišić, Xiaolin Chang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueueing theoryComputer scienceCloud computingLayered queueing networkComputer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicular Cloud (VC), leveraging the computational and communication capabilities of vehicles, is a promising paradigm for enhancing intelligent transportation systems. The recent IEEE 802.11bd telecommunications standard plays a vital role in enabling high-speed, low-latency communication for advanced vehicular applications. This study employs analytical modeling of a VC with IEEE 802.11bd using an M/G/m queueing system to assess its performance. The model enables cloud operators to understand the relationship between the number of servers, the Erlangian service rate, and the arrival rate on one hand, and performance indicators such as execution time in the cloud and task completion time on the other. These insights are essential for optimizing resource allocation and improving the overall performance and reliability of vehicular networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207