MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403923137 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.124.267606

Comparison of Posttherapy 4- and 24-Hour [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT and Pretherapy PSMA PET/CT in Assessment of Disease in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2024· article· en· W4403923137 on OpenAlexaff
Mina Swiha, Sarennya Pathmanandavel, Nathan Papa, Zahra Sabahi, Sherrington Li, Alex Zheng, Sobia Khan, Maria Ayers, Shikha Sharma, Megan Crumbaker, Andrew Nguyen, Lyn Chan, Narjess Ayati, Louise Emmett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerMedicineNuclear medicineRadiologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an effective treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT 24 h after injection has shown potential as a response biomarker for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy but is not convenient for patients. This study investigated 4-h [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT as an alternative to 24-h [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT for evaluation of treatment response. Methods: This prospective analysis enrolled 23 patients diagnosed with mCRPC commencing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy. Two patients were excluded because of incomplete imaging data. Posttherapy SPECT/CT was performed at 4 and 24 h after the first dose and 4 h after the second dose. Baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 4- and 24-h [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT were analyzed both visually and semiquantitatively. Bland–Altman plots assessed agreement of semiquantitative parameters from the 4- and 24-h scans. Quantitative assessment of the change in the total tumor volume (TTV) on the 4-h [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT after the first and second doses was correlated to patient outcomes. Results: All patients had mCRPC previously treated with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, and 11 (52%) received prior taxane chemotherapy. Median age was 78 y, and median prostate-specific antigen level was 54 ng/mL. On visual analysis, disease distribution was unchanged among the 3 imaging methods. Eleven patients (52%) had a median of 1 lesion not identified on 4-h [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT compared with 24-h [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT. All missed lesions on the 4-h [177Lu]Lu SPECT/CT were smaller than 2 cm. Mean differences and agreement between 4- and 24-h SPECT/CT quantitative parameters were within acceptable bounds for lesion number, SUVmax, and SUVmean, with higher variation observed for TTV. The change in TTV between dose 1 and 2 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT predicted prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival. Conclusion: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT at 4 h after injection appears a promising alternative to 24-h [177Lu]Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT for treatment response assessment, with improved patient convenience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207