Quantifying neurovascular coupling through a concurrent assessment of arterial, capillary, and neuronal activation in humans: A multimodal EEG-fNIRS-TCD investigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study explored a novel multimodal neuroimaging approach to assess neurovascular coupling (NVC) in humans using electroencephalography (EEG), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD). METHODS: Fifteen participants (nine females; age 19-32) completed concurrent EEG-fNIRS-TCD imaging during motor (finger tapping) and visual ("Where's Waldo?") tasks, with synchronized monitoring of blood pressure, capnography, and heart rate. fNIRS assessed microvascular oxygenation within the frontal, motor, parietal, and occipital cortices, while the middle and posterior cerebral arteries (MCA/PCA) were insonated using TCD. A 16-channel EEG set-up was placed according to the 10-20 system. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare physiological responses between the active and resting phases of the tasks, while cross-correlations with zero legs compared cerebral and systemic hemodynamic responses across both tasks. RESULTS: Time-frequency analysis demonstrated a reduction in alpha and low beta band power in electrodes C3/C4 during finger tapping (p<0.045) and all electrodes during the Waldo task (all p<0.001). During Waldo, cross-correlation analysis demonstrated the change in oxygenated hemoglobin and cerebral blood velocity had a moderate-to-strong negative correlation with systemic physiological influences, highlighting the measured change resulted from neuronal input. Deoxygenated hemoglobin displayed the greatest negative cross-correlation with the MCA/PCA within the motor cortices and visual during the motor and visual tasks, respectively (range:0.54, -0.82). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed EEG-fNIRS-TCD response to comprehensively assess the NVC response within human, specifically quantifying the real-time temporal synchrony between neuronal activation (EEG), microvascular oxygenation changes (fNIRS), and conduit artery velocity alterations (TCD).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".