Statistical curve models for inferring 3D chromatin architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) chromatin structure from conformation capture assays (such as Hi-C) is a critical task in computational biology, since chromatin spatial architecture plays a vital role in numerous cellular processes and direct imaging is challenging. Most existing algorithms that operate on Hi-C contact matrices produce reconstructed 3D configurations in the form of a polygonal chain. However, none of the methods exploit the fact that the target solution is a (smooth) curve in 3D: this contiguity attribute is either ignored or indirectly addressed by imposing spatial constraints that are challenging to formulate. In this paper we develop both B-spline and smoothing spline techniques for directly capturing this potentially complex 1D curve. We subsequently combine these techniques with a Poisson model for contact counts and compare their performance on a real data example. In addition, motivated by the sparsity of Hi-C contact data, especially when obtained from single-cell assays, we appreciably extend the class of distributions used to model contact counts. We build a general distribution-based metric scaling (DBMS) framework from which we develop zero-inflated and Hurdle Poisson models as well as negative binomial applications. Illustrative applications make recourse to bulk Hi-C data from IMR90 cells and single-cell Hi-C data from mouse embryonic stem cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".