Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simulating fermionic systems on a quantum computer requires representing fermionic states using qubits. The complexity of many simulation algorithms depends on the complexity of implementing rotations generated by fermionic creation-annihilation operators, and the space depends on the number of qubits used. While standard fermion encodings like Jordan-Wigner are space optimal for arbitrary fermionic systems, physical symmetries like particle conservation can reduce the number of physical configurations, allowing improved space complexity. Such space saving is only feasible if the gate overhead is small, suggesting a (quantum) data structures problem, wherein one would like to minimize space used to represent a fermionic state, while still enabling efficient rotations. We define a structure which naturally captures mappings from fermions to systems of qubits. We then instantiate it in two ways, giving rise to two new second-quantized fermion encodings of $F$ fermions in $M$ modes. An information theoretic minimum of $\mathcal{I}:=\lceil\log \binom{M}{F}\rceil$ qubits is required for such systems, a bound we nearly match over the entire parameter regime. (1) Our first construction uses $\mathcal I+o(\mathcal I)$ qubits when $F=o(M)$, and allows rotations generated by creation-annihilation operators in $O(\mathcal I)$ gates and $O(\log M \log \log M)$ depth. (2) Our second construction uses $\mathcal I+O(1)$ qubits when $F=Θ(M)$, and allows rotations generated by creation-annihilation operators in $O(\mathcal I^3)$ gates. In relation to comparable prior work, the first represents a polynomial improvement in both space and gate complexity (against Kirby et al. 2022), and the second represents an exponential improvement in gate complexity at the cost of only a constant number of additional qubits (against Harrison et al. or Shee et al. 2022), in the described parameter regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".