Periodic Event-Triggered Consensus Using Relative-State Measurements: A Hybrid System Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Often in practical applications, such as coordinated motion of autonomous vehicles, multi-agent systems (MASs) utilize information obtained from sensors to accomplish complex tasks, asynchronously. In this work, we consider the problem of consensus where the agents obtain relative-state measurements, at their own sampling frequencies, and employ a distributed event-triggered protocol to dictate when to update control. For the designed event-triggered protocol, only local intermittent relative-state measurements are utilized, where they are obtained and evaluated only at pre-determined event-monitoring instants; these instants are governed by sampling periods whose bounds are explicitly pre-computed, individually, for each agent. Hence, the designed protocol is inherently asynchronous and avoid Zeno behaviour by construction. To cope with the continuous-time dynamics of the agents and discrete-time sensing and controller updates, the overall MAS is modelled using the hybrid system framework. A numerical example is provided to clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the designed protocol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it