MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

‘Nadie puede competir porque nadie se atreve a prestar más barato!’ Ilbank de Turquía y agua pública

2024· article· es· W4403934627 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Rıza Güngen

Bibliographic record

VenueOla Financiera · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Como banco público de desarrollo de tamaño mediano en Turquía, Ilbank es crucial para financiar el suministro de agua. Proporciona préstamos más baratos a los municipios y sirve como intermediario para acceder a fondos internacionales. Ilbank, propiedad de los municipios y diseñado para servirles, es único en el sector bancario de Turquía en términos de financiamiento para la provisión de agua. Sin embargo, el potencial de Ilbank para ampliar su papel es limitado debido a las recientes revisiones de su mandato, los intentos de desviar sus recursos, y su estructura antidemocrática. Un Ilbank reformado y democratizado podría ser un actor crucial en la construcción de un sistema integrado de gestión del agua y el saneamiento para Turquía.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOla FinancieraSame topicWater Governance and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207