El Banco Popular y de Desarrollo Comunal y el Financiamiento Comunitario del Agua en Costa Rica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo se analiza el papel del Banco Popular y de Desarrollo Comunal (BPDC) de Costa Rica en el financiamiento de sistemas públicos de abastecimiento de agua y saneamiento (AAS). Se aborda la relación del banco con los operadores comunitarios de agua, conocidos como Asociaciones administradoras de los Sistemas de Acueductos y Alcantarillados (ASADA). Las ASADA brindan servicios de agua en zonas rurales y semiurbanas de Costa Rica. Desde 2006, el BPDC ha construido importantes relaciones con las ASADA y el Instituto Costarricense de Acueductos y Alcantarillados (AyA), que también es responsable de brindar servicios de agua y saneamiento en las áreas urbanas de Costa Rica y actúa como regulador nacional del sector AAS. Sin embargo, el artículo se centra en la relación de BPDC con las ASADA, ya que tiene una relación de financiamiento directo con ellas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".