Multisite disease analytics with applications to estimating COVID-19 undetected cases in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Even with daily case counts, the true scope of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada is unknown due to undetected cases. We develop a novel multisite disease analytics model which estimates undetected cases using discrete-valued multivariate time series in the framework of Bayesian hidden Markov modelling techniques. We apply our multisite model to estimate the pandemic scope using publicly available disease count data including detected cases, recoveries among detected cases, and total deaths. These counts are used to estimate the case detection probability, the infection fatality rate through time, the probability of recovery, and several important population parameters including the rate of spread and importation of external cases. We estimate the total number of active COVID-19 cases per region of Canada for each reporting interval. We applied this multisite model Canada-wide to all provinces and territories, providing an estimate of the total COVID-19 burden for the 90 weeks from 23 April 2020 to 10 February 2022. We also applied this model to the five health authority regions of British Columbia, Canada, describing the pandemic in B.C. over the 31 weeks from 2 April 2020 to 30 October 2020.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".