Enhanced Potato Pest Identification: A Deep Learning Approach for Identifying Potato Pests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Potato crops and their salability are influenced by potato pests in that both crop yield and quality are reduced. This in turn reduces the income for potato farmers due to lower prices for the crop, lower crop yield, trade restriction and reduced market access. Agricultural viability over the long run therefore depends on sustainable pest management. In order to efficiently detect potato pests, a dataset was constructed which contains eight prevalent potato species that were taken from several sources. Image pre-processing techniques were employed enhance image quality for compatibility with deep learning models. Among InceptionV3, VGG-16, and MobileNetV2 models, VGG-16 attained the highest accuracy of 94.44%, outperforming others. Inception-V3 achieved 58% accuracy, while MobileNetV2 reached 75%. Pre-processing has a major influence on improving result accuracy, which emphasizes its significance in enhancing model performance, according to an evaluation of its effects. These findings might lead to the development of pest management strategies for potato farming that are more effective. The efficient use of VGG-16 in potato pest identification systems is demonstrated by its excellent performance. Using deep learning models can therefore reduce financial losses and promote sustainable potato production. This study provides an approach for further investigation into the best ways to control pests in potato production, allowing farmers to overcome the obstacles and take advantage of valuable market prospects even in the face of pest threats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".