MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403936959 · doi:10.29173/cjen232

Postpartum Hemorrhage Management in Canadian Emergency Nursing Practice

2024· article· en· W4403936959 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Luigi Imbrogno, Jack Heard, Christopher Picard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Nursing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of ManitobaRed River College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency nursingMedicineNursingNursing managementMedical emergencyObstetricsEmergency department

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading cause of maternal mortality globally, claiming approximately 70,000 lives annually. Despite preventive efforts, high-income countries, including Canada, have reported increasing rates of PPH. The rising incidence and associated complications indicate improved emergency nursing practices in managing PPH are needed. Methods: PPH guidelines from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, Federation of International Gynecologists and Obstetricians, and the Canadian Association of Perinatal, and Women’s Health Nurses were compared to National Emergency Nurses Association guidelines. The competencies, medications, and obstetric maneuvers for PPH that may be relevant to emergency nurses were extracted and categorized for the emergency nursing HIRAID (History & Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, & Diagnosis) framework. Findings/Results: We found 13 discrete skills across the PPH guideline recommendations that are applicable to emergency nurses. There is near perfect overlap in medical recommendations, but gaps exist between FIGO and SOGC guidelines and NENA and CAPWHN guidelines. There are SOGC and FIGO guidelines that apply to emergency nurses that are not addressed in NENA guidelines, Discussion: There was significant overlap on treatment recommendations from maternal health bodies such as uterotonic drugs, hemorrhage control, and hemostatic resuscitation. There were significant gaps in NENA recommendations. Conclusion: The comparison of PPH guidelines highlights where NENA guidelines need further detail. These skills are particularly significant for providing nursing care in rural and remote areas. Standardized protocols for PPH management, interprofessional collaboration, and regular competency assessments are included in most guidelines but are conspicuously absent for emergency nurses. To address the gap, NENA could integrate national emergency nursing PPH competencies standards or develop recommendations for the care of maternal emergencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Emergency NursingSame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207