The Left Insula Bridges Cognition, Emotion, and Brain Structure: A Multilayer Network Analysis of the Human Connectome Project-Young Adult
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multilayer network analyses allow for the exploration of complex relationships across different modalities. Specifically, this study employed a novel method that integrates psychometric networks with structural covariance networks to explore the relationships between cognition, emotion and the brain. Psychological (NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery and NIH Toolbox Emotion Battery) and anatomical MRI (cortical volume) data were extracted from the Human Connectome Project Young Adult dataset ( n = 1109). Partial correlation networks with graphical lasso regularisation and extended Bayesian information criterion tuning were used to model a psychometric bi-layer network consisting of seven cognitive nodes and four emotion nodes, as well as a neuro-psychometric tri-layer network consisting of these same nodes in addition to 24 brain nodes from the central executive and salience networks. Bridge strength centrality was used to identify nodes that bridged between layers. For the bi-layer network, it was found that stress was the only bridge node. For the tri-layer network, six bridge nodes were identified, with the left insula emerging as the most central. These findings demonstrate the utility of multilayer networks in integrating psychological and neurobiological data for the potential identification of targets to improve psychological wellbeing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".