Unclocklike Oscillators with Frequency Memory for the Entrainment of Biological Clocks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entrainment experiments on the vertebrate segmentation clock have revealed that embryonic oscillators actively change their internal frequency to adapt to the driving signal. This is not consistent with either a one-dimensional clock model or a limit-cycle model, but rather it suggests a new “unclocklike” behavior. In this work, we propose simple, biologically realistic descriptions of such internal frequency adaptation, where a phase oscillator activates a memory variable controlling the oscillator's frequency. We study two opposite limits for the control of the memory variable, one with a smooth phase-averaging memory field, and the other with a pulsatile, phase-dependent activation. Both models recapitulate intriguing properties of the entrained segmentation clock, such as very broad Arnold tongues and an entrainment phase plateauing with detuning. We compute analytically multiple properties of such systems, such as entrainment phases and cycle shapes. We further describe new phenomena, including hysteresis in entrainment, bistability in the frequency of the entrained oscillator, and probabilistic entrainment. Our work shows that oscillators with frequency memory can exhibit new classes of unclocklike properties that can be tested through experimental entrainment. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".